<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acronymania</title>
	<link>http://thepeoplebrand.com/blog/2007/10/05/acronymania/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Corina</title>
		<link>http://thepeoplebrand.com/blog/2007/10/05/acronymania/#comment-147620</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thepeoplebrand.com/blog/2007/10/05/acronymania/#comment-147620</guid>
					<description>I think that, by using acronyms, some people think that they're experts in a domain. Only the &quot;chosen&quot; ones can understand what they're saying, because they're saying only for the chosen ones. Yap... And then they wonder why, instead of 300 attenders to their event they had only 25. Because! Anyway, this is a common arrogance in more that one domain of activity: assuming that if they use acronyms they're experts. Duah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that, by using acronyms, some people think that they&#8217;re experts in a domain. Only the &#8220;chosen&#8221; ones can understand what they&#8217;re saying, because they&#8217;re saying only for the chosen ones. Yap&#8230; And then they wonder why, instead of 300 attenders to their event they had only 25. Because! Anyway, this is a common arrogance in more that one domain of activity: assuming that if they use acronyms they&#8217;re experts. Duah!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
