Don’t Forget the Change

People are rarely, if ever, satisfied.

We’re not satisfied with fast food customer service, politicians, football officials, nor the price of gas.

Most of all, we’re not satisfied with ourselves. Not with our weight, our salaries, our homes and cars. We’re not satisfied with the time we have for exercise, for fun, for friendships and family.

And we’re ready to change.

What does your product do to change me? How does your store, church, firm, agency, book, movie, music, PowerPoint preso, shoe, gym… help me make the changes I so badly desire?

I think most don’t help us change.  I think too often, they simply manage to help us maintain the status quo.

Is that enough?

 

Blue Sheep
… when you can simply advertise with Blue Sheep?

I think Blue Sheep is a great example of the mindset of most advertisers and marketers today. The effort to be different is focused almost exclusively on the promotion. Meanwhile, their positioning (brand), product, pricing, placement (distribution), and people are unremarkable.

This is Flash-in-the-pan thinking. It’s not sustainable. Customers may try you once, but you haven’t done anything to make them loyal fans. You haven’t done anything encouraging them to refer their friends.

So, what to do you have to do? Make more Blue Sheep, which isn’t easy. Remember, you’re dealing with a fairly unremarkable product.

With a Purple Cow, your product is remarkable. Therefore, it makes it easier to draw remarkable people as employees.

It’s easier to get remarkable distribution (i.e. ecclectic shops or simply higher demand).

You almost automatically create remarkable positioning.

You will likely have more leverage for pricing toward better margins.

Remarkable promotion becomes much easier, more natural. You simply tell the story.

So, you have a choice: Purple Cow or Blue Sheep. Which is it for you?

(hat tip: Ernie Schenck)

 

What’s more valuable than a product to sell? How about a person who’ll buy?

While explaining the blockbuster success of Broadway’s upcoming Odd Couple, Seth Godin makes a not so odd statement.

The lesson is that the new marketing makes it a lot easier to make products for your customers (instead of having to run around finding customers for your products.)

How many of us have had this wrong the whole time?

 

Starbucks Tribal Knowledge graphic
johnmoore of Brand Autopsy was gracious enough to pay a visit to us business marketers in Tulsa at this month’s Business Marketing Association meeting. Speaking on Starbucks Tribal Knowledge (Business and Marketing Lessons Learned from Working Inside Starbucks), johnmoore gave a great presentation and left everybody wanting more.

One of my favorite nuggets within the presentation was Starbucks (unwritten) Code of Marketing Authenticity:
1. Be genuine and authentic.
2. Always say who you are, not who you aren’t
(we don’t do this, we don’t do that).
3. Deliver on all promises made
4. Respect people’s intelligence.
(even provide mental stimulation)
5. Never forsake the company’s heritage and personality for a short term gain. (i.e. no Starbucks combo meal)

John drew a great group of people and held their rapt attention the entire time. Although I had watched the Starbucks Tribal Knowledge presentation online, there’s nothing like the real thing.

Afterwards, I was lucky enough to continue the discussion with johnmoore at a local Starbucks (go figure) and pow-wow on a few topics… almost to the point of John missing his flight. Not being a frequent patron of Starbucks, I was unsure what to order. I had enjoyed a few mochas in the past, but figured there might be something better suited for my tastes. John recommended something that ended up being an excellent drink (what the heck was that thing John?). It will probably start putting a little dent in my monthly budget. By the way, all of this hullabaloo about John knowing the inner workings of Starbucks and he didn’t even finagle free drinks for us. Some inside expert!

All-in-all, Wednesday was wonderful. By the end of the day, I had gained a greater appreciation for Starbucks marketing philosophies, their product, their experience, and the very pleasant johnmoore who delivered on all promises made (see #3 above).

Everyone was captivated by what johnmoore shared
Everyone was captivated by what johnmoore shared

John drew a great group.
John drew a great group.

There were plenty of questions about Starbucks Tribal Knowledge afterward.
There were plenty of questions about Starbucks Tribal Knowledge afterward.

 


Thanks to Erica, who pointed out Jones Soda. I knew they accepted submitted photos to use on their product packaging. I didn’t think of them as one that might receive submissions via their website.

Unlike Taco Bell (see Talking Sauce) and Dentyne, Jones Soda has set up galleries of their many labels. What I also love is Jones Soda didn’t just set up a submission form. They also created a gallery through which viewers can peruse the submitted photos and vote for their favorites.

Jones Soda does a good job of keeping their store presence and online presence consistent. They’ve taken their website and created a place where customers can connect, collaborate, and create community.

Maybe Taco Bell and Dentyne will follow suit.

 

Ernie Mosteller talks about the silver bullet of advertising.

Integrated agencies have sort of the right idea. Problem is, what they’re integrating is the web and traditional media. By my count, now that’s five ways to deliver an advertising message: TV, print, radio, outdoor, web.

I’ve come to the same conclusion, and Ernie does a great job of encapsulating the problem. I think he’s onto something with a solution as well.

There is a silver bullet, though.
It’s the same bullet that’s always been silver: a great idea.

Notice I didn’t say, “concept.” I could have, but in advertising, “concept” implies a medium. In today’s world, a great idea crosses all boundaries, all media, and infects every part of a business’ face to the public. Delivery method is part of the idea – but not the idea itself.

Problem is, I think this still falls short. I don’t think we should just address the business’ “face” to the public. Companies need more than just a pretty face in order to succeed. The business needs to be addressed from the front door to the back office. And most agencies are not getting it done.

 

The 3 Rs of Business

Not the 3 Rs of education (reading, writing, and arithmetic). How are two of those “R”s anyway?

The 3 Rs of business.

R&D
HR
and PR

These should be the fundamentals of any business.

R&D
“Never ‘ally’ with a ‘vendor’ not in the Top Decile of their industry on R & D spending!”
Tom Peters

Research and development is the heart and soul of a business. This is where the remarkable are set apart from the also-rans. R&D shouldn’t just focus on the product itself, but should focus on what is REALLY being sold. Customer experience. This includes the product, the package, the purchase process, the customer support, the storefront, the showroom, etc. Without this, your business has no soul. It’s an empty shell.

HR
“Hiring people is an art, not a science, and resumes can’t tell you whether someone will fit into a company’s culture.”
Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, May, 1998 issue of Entrepreneur

What is your process in hiring employees? What is your effort to keep them? Stop interviewing prospective employees to find out what they CAN do.
1) Start finding out what they LOVE to do. Find out what drives them and motivates them. Find out if they are PASSIONATE about your product, service, customers, market, and/or industry.
2) Then EQUIP them. Train them to serve. They should know the heart of your company. They should know what makes it “tick.”
3) Then REWARD them for taking risks. Not just for safe successes.

HR is the embodiment of your company. It creates and sustains the hands and feet, eyes and ears of your business.

PR
… to this day, most institutions still look upon public relations as their ‘trumpet’ and not their ‘hearing aid.’ It’s got to be both.
Peter Drucker

PR doesn’t stand for Press Release, it stands for PUBLIC RELATIONS. It doesn’t mean just getting a front cover story in the business section. PR is the spirit of your company. It is the expression of everything within your business (product, people, mission, values, etc.) and how you absorb influences outside your business (customers, crises, competition, market shifts, etc.). PR is communication. It is speaking AND hearing. It also speaks through more than words (advertising), it’s through your body language and your inactions as well. Without PR, no one will ever accurately know the heart and soul of your business and your business will never accurately know the heart and soul of it’s customers.

The 3 Rs are the Heart, Body, and Spirit of your business. Have you looked at your business holistically? Is it a shell? Two-thirds or one-third of what it should be?

 


Per Bruce and (of course) Seth, Gilette has announced they will unveil a 5-blade razor in early 2006.

Somebody please remind me, what is the benefit of multiple blades? Multiple opportunities to cut myself? Originally, I believe they touted that you could get a smooth shave with one stroke of the razor. So, instead of shaving over the same area two or three times, now you just go over it once. Good idea.

Did I ever shave the same area five times? No. Not unless I want razor burn so bad that my neck resembles the topography of Mars. So, what is the purpose? Marketing. One-upmanship. OK, one-upmanship marketing.

Seems like the megahertz “myth” redux. Wintel PCs were blowing away Apple in megahertz speed ratings. In a race to have the fastest PC, manufacturers eventually commodotized the market. After one gigahertz (1,000 mhz), very few people could find reasons to buy faster computers. Soon, manufacturers were looking for another way to differentiate their product. Now speed is almost a non-factor. Any new PC is usually fast enough. It’s the peripherals (monitor, mp3 player, printers, cameras) that steer purchases now.

So, has Gillette (and the razor market) “jumped the shark?” I think so. Yet, razors don’t typically use peripherals so I’ll be interested to see how they differentiate themselves after this.

 

Uncommoditize

Where are you, your company, your product, your brand, your industry?

Tipability Pendulum

 

OK, I’ll admit that I’m an Apple fan. Having a background in graphics, I have been hooked on Apple products since I was introduced to them in college. I’m used to hearing how the sky is falling and Apple is hanging on by a thread. That’s why I’m so happy to see this news, this news, and this news. Apple sold over 650,000 computers in the first half of the year, approximately two-thirds being PC users. This placed Apple as the fourth leading personal computer seller in the nation, above IBM. Apple saw the biggest year-to-year jump of any major U.S. manufacturer.

Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to say Paul Nixon was right in assessing this as Apple’s tipping point, but he’s looking more accurate than some pessimistic analysts that downplayed the combination of the iPod with Apple’s introduction of the Mac Mini. Apple has ceased to give sales figures for product families, so we do not know the sales figures for the Mac Minis. But, so far it looks like it has been a good move for Apple.

So Chicken Little, where are you?

 

Seth Godin has displayed four curves depicting typical product life cycles. He’s asked for names for each. Below, I’ve given my titles, descriptions, and names for each curve:

The Phenom
Unusually talented and charismatic with incredible exposure. But it’s not just hype. There’s substance that allows it to endure.
Names: Michael Jordan/Elvis Presley (I couldn’t choose between these two)

The One Hit Wonder
Either it was all hype and no substance, or just stumbled onto success it wasn’t equipped to sustain.
Name: Vanilla Ice

The Late Bloomer
This curve takes time developing into full potential. It is often ahead of it’s time. Sadly, this curve may die before it is discovered. Then someone else reaps the rewards of its brilliance.
Name: Vincent Van Gogh

The Underachiever
This curve squanders whatever resources it has. It keeps talking about going in different directions, but ends up remaining flat. Often remains stuck in the past.
Name: Uncle Rico (Napoleon Dynamite)

 

I was talking with my brother-in-law a while back and we were talking shop. He is a manager within a large software corporation. Somehow the conversation lead him to discuss how their consumer software has changed over the last few years.

Over the course of time we just kept adding more and more features to the application. Then we started a program where we actually would go to the customer’s home and watch them use the software. We realized that they didn’t need more features. They needed things to be easier to use. At some point our features had stopped being useful and had started making things complicated.

That’s a great example of capes and kryptonite. You can take great ideas and turn them into something that cripples the customer. It might be new features, a new website design, a new phone system, or even a decision to move your location. You have to weigh these decisions from the eyes of the customer. “Is this going to help my customers soar, or is it just going to make them sour?”

 

In our last article, we discussed the longevity of a product affecting how that product is promoted and sold. Art Kleiner wrote an interesting article for Strategy&Business concerning a product’s death cycle. Kleiner laments the decline of product quality since the 1980s. As quality declined, so did durability, and so did expectations. Kleiner cites lower customer satisfaction ratings for Hewlitt-Packard (surprise, surprise) and even at GE. These results may be even more concerning knowing that consumer expectations are lower now. Now, we buy a $40 DVD player and expect it to break eventually. An interesting result of the cheaper products is repairs now cost more than a new DVD player. We’ve made it a disposable product.

Products are designed for obsoletion. Razor blades become dull, diets are fads, sports-themed video games are tied into the year they’re produced. The razor blades are a quality issue, the other two products do not cease to work, they are usually replaced by products that seem better. Kleiner points to experts who suggest the solution to the quality issue may arise through competition and innovation. Competition pushes companies to create better products and services in order to survive, but it may also tempt companies to allow commoditization and lower prices. Innovation creates “purchasing lust” within potential buyers. Innovation is the most viable alternative to cost cutting and quality reducing measures. It is the path traveled by diet fads, video games, Apple, JetBlue, and even by regional fast food chain Sonic Drive-Ins. As these price and quality wars rage, we’ll see if Tom Peters’ adage, “Innovate or die” is true. I have a feeling his proclamation will be the epitaph of many companies’ headstones.

Dustin Staiger

 

A startup has burst onto the scene with an incredible innovation! Regiats Electronics has created the GE killer. In a press release this week, the electronics and manufacturing startup announced the creation of the perfect light bulb. Coined “Reluminate,” the new bulbs will never burn out. The problem with a bulb that never burns out is that once you buy bulbs for every bulb socket in your house, you no longer will buy anything from Regiats Electronics. So what’s their plan? Regiats has decided to use a subscription-based business model. Each bulb has a wireless chip within it that broadcasts a signal to local cellular networks. This signal is distinct to each bulb, which has a monthly subscription price based on the wattage and size of the bulb. As long as the subscription is active, then the bulb’s status is enabled through the wireless signal. So, if you live outside of wireless phone coverage, the bulb will be disabled and you’re out of luck. If you stop paying your subscription, you’re stuck with an unusable bulb.

Of course this isn’t true. The majority of people will not change to subscription-based light bulbs in the near future. If a “perfect light bulb” were invented, we’d probably be more open to usage-based bulbs than subscriptions. I believe that most people have an inherent aversion to subscriptions. We don’t mind subscribing to services (phone services, Internet access, cable TV) or publications. These have become traditional subscription items. So, an even greater obstacle than the aversion to subscriptions is the established traditions. And as Seth Godin states, traditions rarely change quickly just because the alternatives are better. This is the hurdle that Napster-like services have to overcome. Their effort would not be as daunting as the fictitous Regiats’ (which is my name, Staiger, spelled backwards), but nonetheless they have to overcome not only the traditional CD purchasing routine, but the standard alternative which is Apple’s iTunes Music Store.

Management and marketing gurus will tell you to focus on what differentiates your company from the competition. The key is to recognize that difference may be a hurdle for your customers to overcome as well. Making a light bulb that never burns out sounds great, but changing the product also changes the business model (which may or may not be so great).

Dustin Staiger